According to the text, what is the current relationship between genomic surveillance and traditional public health methods?

It is understood to be a complement rather than a replacement

The maturation of genomic sequencing technology has clarified its role within the broader public health framework. It is not intended to entirely supplant established epidemiological practices, but rather to serve as a powerful enhancement and complement to them. Genomic data provides the molecular detail—identifying specific strains, tracking mutations, and mapping evolutionary pathways—while traditional epidemiology supplies the crucial context of human behavior, location, and transmission chains. The most effective strategy, as evidenced by frameworks like that utilized by the RKI, involves tightly integrating molecular findings (like pinpointing a specific *Salmonella* strain) with classic epidemiological data to initiate immediate, targeted interventions based on comprehensive evidence.