How does the risk vividness associated with Early Healthcare Digital Consent compare to that of Modern Consumer Digital Consent, based on the feature comparison table?

Answer

Healthcare consent has high risk vividness, tied to immediate physical harm or treatment outcomes, while consumer risk is low/opaque, tied to future inference or profiling.

The comparison table explicitly contrasts the nature of risks associated with different consent contexts. Early digital consent in healthcare, exemplified by BPPC/APPC, dealt with infrequent but highly significant events, meaning the associated risks—such as improper treatment or breach of sensitive medical records—were highly vivid and tied to immediate physical harm or treatment outcomes. Conversely, modern consumer digital consent operates under conditions where risk vividness is generally low or opaque. Consumer risks are typically related to future concerns like algorithmic bias, profiling, or secondary inference drawn from aggregated data, which lack the immediate, tangible consequence felt in a medical setting.

How does the risk vividness associated with Early Healthcare Digital Consent compare to that of Modern Consumer Digital Consent, based on the feature comparison table?
inventioncreatorconsentdigital system