How did the operational stresses on an early tire chain differ from those on a drive chain developed concurrently?
Answer
Tire chains had to withstand constant battering from road debris, unlike lubricated drive chains.
Tire chains were designed for robust, external contact with harsh elements like ice and mud, while drive chains, used for power transmission, functioned in a controlled, lubricated setting requiring tight tolerances.
Related Questions
Why did the immediate need for tire chains arise in the early days of motoring?What foundational application predates the automotive use of interconnected metal links?Around what period were the earliest documented patents for vehicle tire chains granted?Who is commonly credited with patenting an early design known as a 'Tire Grip' in 1904?How did the operational stresses on an early tire chain differ from those on a drive chain developed concurrently?What risk was associated with early motorists failing to remove iron or basic steel tire chains after reaching pavement?What evolution in design addressed load distribution and improved turning capability beyond Weed's initial design?What characterized the difficulty of early chain fastening mechanisms?What material shift was indicated by the movement towards lighter, case-hardened alloys in chain production?What physical constant ensured that chains remained a necessary item even as road surfaces improved significantly through the 1920s?