What critical context regarding manual transcription latency explained the strong commercial impetus to automate call transcription?

Answer

A standard three-minute phone call might take an hour or more to transcribe accurately.

The inherent latency involved in the manual transcription process provided a powerful business driver for the automation of call transcription services. Because human transcribers were limited by the speed of machine playback and their own typing capabilities, the time investment required for processing audio was extremely high relative to the duration of the recording. This slow rate meant that even a short, standard three-minute phone call could require sixty minutes or substantially longer to accurately convert into text, accounting for necessary pauses, rewinding, and review. This massive inefficiency explained why the commercial motivation to develop imperfect automated solutions was so strong—they offered the potential for near-instantaneous processing.

What critical context regarding manual transcription latency explained the strong commercial impetus to automate call transcription?
inventiontechnologycommunicationcalltranscription