How did the 1787 clock compare economically to the versatile clocks that followed Thomas’s design?
Answer
It would have held little to no resale value.
The 1787 clock, being single-use, would have held little to no resale value compared to the versatile clocks that followed Thomas’s design, which held commercial viability.
Related Questions
What time was Levi Hutchins's original alarm clock specifically set to ring?Which state was the location of Levi Hutchins when he invented his alarm clock?What feature distinguished Hutchins's 1787 invention from later, commercial alarm clocks?Who is credited with the turning point for the widespread adoption of the mechanical alarm clock?In what decade did Seth Thomas begin producing affordable, reliable alarm clocks?What was Seth Thomas's crucial contribution compared to Hutchins's initial concept?In which city/town did Seth Thomas establish his alarm clock production?What contrast illustrates the difference between Hutchins's and Thomas's contributions?What skill was primarily required for the engineering of Hutchins’s fixed-time mechanism?What silent impact did widely accessible adjustable alarms have on the structure of American labor?How did the 1787 clock compare economically to the versatile clocks that followed Thomas’s design?