How did New York City's initial pricing plan compare to Vickrey's theoretical ideal regarding responsiveness?
Answer
It was closer to the fixed-rate model, which is easier administratively
New York’s initial plan utilized a fixed-rate model based on time of day and location, making it administratively simpler but less responsive to fluctuating traffic demand than the theoretical ideal of charging the marginal social cost at that exact moment.
Related Questions
Who is credited with developing the foundational economic theory behind congestion pricing?What fundamental economic concept underpins Vickrey's theory for optimizing road usage pricing?In the context of congestion pricing, what specific cost is identified as the 'externality' that conventional, free travel fails to account for?Which city initiated one of the earliest real-world cordon pricing schemes in the early 1970s?What was the approximate initial base toll set for passenger vehicles entering New York City's proposed congestion zone?What critical dual goal did New York City aim to achieve by implementing congestion pricing?What did analysts note was the primary focus of political opposition during the New York City implementation struggle?What does the stalled implementation process in New York City underscore regarding congestion pricing adoption?What financial mechanism is suggested as crucial for gaining public buy-in regarding congestion charges?How did New York City's initial pricing plan compare to Vickrey's theoretical ideal regarding responsiveness?