According to Tesla's 1916 interview claims, what negative effect did Franklin’s pointed rod potentially have?
Answer
It increased the frequency of lightning strikes on protected buildings.
Tesla stated that Franklin’s pointed rod actually increased the frequency of strikes by drawing the charge to the building rather than deflecting or neutralizing it.
Related Questions
Who is firmly attributed with inventing the device designed to protect structures from the destructive force of lightning?What was the basic, effective principle established by Benjamin Franklin for lightning protection?According to Tesla's 1916 interview claims, what negative effect did Franklin’s pointed rod potentially have?Why did Tesla argue that the sharp point of Franklin's rod was inherently flawed?What U.S. Patent number was granted to Nikola Tesla for a Lightning Protector in 1916?What technical element of the strike did Franklin's rod primarily manage, according to the text?What key difference existed between Tesla's approach and Franklin's concept regarding energy management?What was Tesla's broader interest regarding atmospheric electricity beyond defensive protection?How does the text analogize Franklin’s lightning rod in the context of modern engineering parallels?What does the text suggest is Tesla's significant legacy concerning the original lightning rod design?What key element was described in Tesla’s patent intended to prevent under near-normal conditions?