How is the creation of functional health data interoperability best characterized?
Answer
As a construction built piece by piece through standards, enforcement, and collaboration
The development of successful health data interoperability was not a singular, sudden breakthrough but rather a long, incremental process spanning decades. This construction involved several distinct phases building upon one another. It began with the basic technical efforts to move beyond paper, solidified through the creation of vital technical standards like HL7, and was finally propelled into widespread operational reality only when powerful legislative actions, such as the 21st Century Cures Act, provided the necessary regulatory force and enforcement mechanisms to overcome market inertia favoring proprietary systems.
Related Questions
What architectural feature defined HL7 version 2 messages requiring complex parsing?What major objective did the 21st Century Cures Act specifically target regarding health data?Which standard utilizes Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and REST architecture?What characterized the earliest forms of digital health data communication before structured standards?What was the primary effect of the HITECH Act of 2009 on interoperability efforts?What is the significant role of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC)?How does FHIR offer a more granular approach compared to HL7 v2 messaging?How is the creation of functional health data interoperability best characterized?What industry-accepted data formats does FHIR employ alongside its REST architecture?How have the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) influenced data sharing requirements?According to the progression summary, what architectural style characterized the HL7 v2 era (Early 2000s)?